header-logo header-logo

Chancery Lane says no to LeO

The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers

Consulting on its draft business plan and budget 2026–27, which closed responses this week, LeO proposed four potential budget increases including its recommended 12.1% boost.

Its other three proposals were for a 6.7%, 8.7% and 17.1% increase. It is also considering broader reforms including changes to its rules, as part of a Scheme Transformation Review.

LeO said it expects to resolve more than 10,000 complaints in the coming year, 57% more than in pre-pandemic years, and is under ‘serious pressure’ due to rising demand. It attributed the rise in complaints to ‘unacceptably high rates’ of ‘poor service’ in first-tier complaints handling, cost-of-living challenges prompting more people to complain, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology such as ChatGPT making it easier for people to lodge complaints.

Responding this week, however, the Law Society rejected LeO’s proposals.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘It is particularly concerning that LeO is proposing to undertake additional work such as a Scheme Transformation Review while struggling to deliver its core statutory function of resolving complaints quickly.

‘We urge LeO to focus on operational efficiency, explore outsourcing and automation.’

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) said it accepts LeO’s recommended budget increase ‘with great reluctance and significant reservations’. The CLC said it has ‘ongoing concerns about operational efficiency and whether… LeO represents value for money’ but accepts that the increase is ‘necessary to avoid deterioration in service levels and turnaround times for consumers’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll