header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 March 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Challenging the balance of power (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

In his second update, Simon Parsons examines the possible grounds to challenge the public law decisions taken by public bodies
  • Grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety.

See 'Challenging the balance of power (Pt 1)' here

Decisions of public bodies are liable to challenge by way of judicial review and may be quashed as ultra vires (beyond the powers) by reference to the ordinary principles of English public law. The jurisdiction of the court is supervisory and not appellate thus judicial review looks at legality, not merits (the quality of the decision) it cannot (supposedly) provide the applicant with a substitute decision as the decision is for government.

Substantive hearing stage

In Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] A C 374 HL (the GCHQ case) Lord Diplock identified (at 410-411) three grounds of judicial review as: 

  • Illegality -where a public body abuses its power. (Substantive ultra vires).
  • Irrationality -unreasonableness- a decision that defies logic- a decision that no sensible person who had applied his mind to
    • If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    Sponsored by
    Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

    Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

    Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

    Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

    Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

    Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

    Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

    Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

    Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: Property cases reshape established principles
    A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
    NLJ this week: Stress ruling raises the bar for employers
    Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
    NLJ this week: Can Manchesterism revive access to justice?
    Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
    NLJ this week: Constitutional conventions tested as power changes hands
    The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
    NLJ this week: Lawyers must become product designers
    The legal profession is undergoing a fundamental shift from selling services to creating technology-enabled products, according to Professor Luke Mason, Head of School of Law at Regent's University London
    Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll