header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Chain reaction

Brent McDonald investigates a defendant’s liability for injuries sustained by a claimant in a subsequent incident

In Dalling v RJ Heale & Co [2011] EWCA Civ 365, [2011] All ER (D) 54 (Apr) the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the defendant was liable for injuries suffered in accidents that occurred three years apart.

Following on from Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] 1 AC 884, [2008] 2 All ER 943, Dalling is a further appellate case dealing with the difficult question of the point at which a claimant can no longer recover for the ongoing consequences of a defendant’s tort.

Facts of Dalling

On 4 March 2005, the claimant suffered a severe head injury while working for the defendant. The head injury included an extensive right petrous bone fracture and extensive frontal contusions leading to brain swelling.

Surprisingly the claimant suffered no significant cognitive or intellectual deficit, but was left with executive dysfunction. This led to poor concentration, short attention span, impaired memory, some loss of emotional control, variation of mood, fatigue, reduced ability to initiate activities or motivate himself, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll