header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Tori Adams , Killian Moran
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Centre of detention

21123
Tori Adams & Killian Moran discuss claims of unlawful detention and the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures
  • Unlawful detention claims: nothing new.
  • Unlawful detention generally: principles of lawfulness.
  • Unlawful detention and COVID-19: the current climate.
  • Important principles of the tort of false imprisonment: human rights legislation.

Unlawful detention claims are nothing new within the jurisdiction of England and Wales, especially in an immigration context, and the law in relation to such claims is well-established and clear. It has long been commonplace that these cases settle before going to court, with the Home Office spending thousands to rectify administrative and legal errors which have led to the continued unlawful detention of immigrants. However, with recent restrictions brought about by COVID-19 we believe that the Home Office, and the courts, should consider what more can be done to reduce the number of people detained under immigration powers. Failing to do so could result in significant periods for which detention is unlawful.

Unlawful detention generally

Immigration practitioners and civil litigators working alongside them will be familiar with the general principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll