header-logo header-logo

11 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

CBA strike suspended… for now

Criminal law barristers have voted to suspend their strike action, following a revised offer from the justice secretary, but warned the dispute would not be resolved until the offer was implemented.

The ballot result was 57% in favour of suspension against almost 43% for continuing the strike (1,488 voted yes to suspending the action while 1,117 voted no, out of 2,605 votes cast).

Justice secretary Brandon Lewis offered an extra £54m, raising fees by 15% for the ‘vast majority’ of cases currently before or due to come before the Crown Court. Under the previous offer, the 15% rise would only apply to cases starting on or after 1 October.

Announcing the ballot results, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Kirsty Brimelow KC (pictured) and CBA executive members said: ‘Barristers should not have to fight so hard again to bring this responsibility back home to government.

‘The offer from the government is an overdue start. Its acceptance by barristers is on the basis that it is implemented.

‘Otherwise, the CBA will ballot again to lift the suspension of action… our members remain ready to act again.’

The CBA said it would now focus on setting up the criminal legal aid advisory board.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The offer was the culmination of many months of work and pressure, and unprecedented personal sacrifice by barristers.’

However, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The justice minister may think he has got one problem off his table but there are bigger problems coming his way as this dispute continues.

‘This is another example of a government U-turn making a bad situation worse’. She warned solicitors would see the government had found ‘a magic money tree to stop the disruptive action of barristers—money that was not available to pay solicitors fairly.’

Boyce called for parity on the 15% fee increase—solicitors’ fees are increasing by just 9%.

Boyce said: ‘If the gap isn’t bridged by the time the government publishes their full response to the independent review in November, we have made it clear we will advise our members that there is no viable future in criminal legal aid work.’

Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll