header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 June 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A cautionary tale

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7799_dobson

Nicholas Dobson discusses a councillor grievance over conduct sanctions

  • A parish council acted unlawfully in purporting to impose sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure when the matter should have been handled under code of conduct provisions in the Localism Act 2011.

Can a parish council bypass the statutory local government conduct regime by imposing a range of extensive sanctions on a councillor under its grievance procedure? No, said Mrs Justice Cockerill on 15 May 2018 in R (Harvey) v Ledbury Town Council and Herefordshire County Council [2018] EWHC 1151 (Admin). For there she found that the parish council in question had had no power to act as it did. But even if the powers had been available, the council would still have acted unlawfully in terms of procedural and substantive unfairness.

Factual background

The case surrounded Councillor Elizabeth Harvey, a member of Ledbury Town Council (the council—legally a parish council under the Local Government Act 1972) who sat on all three of the council’s main committees (finance, planning and environment). Following a formal complaint of alleged bullying and intimidation against Cllr Harvey

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll