header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Mark Sefton , Oliver Radley-Gardner
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A cautionary tale

Clark v Lucas Solicitors serves as a timely warning for conveyancing solicitors say Mark Sefton & Oliver Radley-Gardner

Conveyancing solicitors acting for residential developers should be aware of the cautionary tale told by Clark v Lucas Solicitors LLP [2009] EWHC 1952 (Ch). Adrian and Heather Clark were the purchasers of a house on a new residential development in Monmouthshire. The purchase price was £560,000. The seller was the developer, a company called Gainsborough Homes Ltd.

The overall funding for the development had been provided in the main loan facility from Natwest Bank plc, but in part also by some lending from an individual called Michael Kenny. The Natwest Bank naturally had a first charge over the whole of the development site to protect the bulk of the finance, and Mr Kenny had a second charge, also over the whole of the site, to protect his own financial input. Both of these were all monies charges, in the sense that they provided the lenders with security for the full amount of whatever might be owing to them from Gainsborough at any particular point in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll