header-logo header-logo

08 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Caution urged on mass claims

Regulators have warned law firms working on financial product mis-selling claims not to breach their professional obligations

In a warning notice, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) expressed concern about improper practices in the mass claims sector, including ‘firms starting to act, and generate costs, before gaining a client’s consent’, ‘poor due diligence during client onboarding leading to low quality and/or inaccurate claims being progressed’, and ‘failures to act promptly or adequately in response to client instructions’.

The SRA said its existing concerns have been heightened by recent attention on the potential for mass claims over car finance customers being charged too much interest, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is currently investigating.

In particular, the SRA is ‘particularly concerned about potential issues regarding firms getting proper instructions from clients and supervising staff in relation to financial services claims when part of high-volume/bulk claim processes involving multiple clients’.

SRA guidance issued alongside the warning notice covers the areas of concern as well as wider areas such as working with third parties and levels of charges.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘How mass claims are handled is a topic which regularly causes us, and others such as the FCA, concern.

‘Whichever mass claims area they are working in, solicitors’ obligations are very clear. We expect the profession to treat clients as individuals, not just a number within a group. This means, for example, communicating with them clearly, giving them a proper assessment of their specific case and related decisions to be made, and asking them for consent before taking any actions in their name. Basically, making sure they adhere to their overall obligation to act in their clients’ interests at all times.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll