header-logo header-logo

Caution on cameras

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Warning over "slippery slope effect"

Peers and MPs have warned of the “slippery slope effect” if cameras are allowed in court.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has published its report into the Crime and Courts Bill, currently at Report stage in the House of Lords. It warns that defendants may not be protected and that victims and witnesses may be deterred from the judicial process because the Bill is too “broad”.

It recommends the government conduct a more comprehensive public consultation, carry out a more detailed impact assessment and review its policy after a few years, and wants filming to be restricted to appellate proceedings in the meantime.

The committee says that, while the government intends to restrict filming to the Court of Appeal initially, the Bill allows for the possibility of this being extended at a later stage.

Dr Hywel Francis MP, chair of the committee, says: “We agree that justice must be transparent and publicly accessible.

“But the power in the Bill is too broad…as currently drafted, it could too easily be extended to include filming of witnesses, parties, crime victims, jurors and defendants—a very different proposition, which could have the unintended consequence of deterring victims and witnesses, and possibly even undermining the fairness of trials. It’s potentially a slippery slope.”

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll