header-logo header-logo

01 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Personal injury , Compensation , Damages
printer mail-detail

Catastrophic payment scheme 'falling short'

Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer

The highest payment in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) was £500,000 in April 1996—and has remained the same since. Had it been increased by inflation, in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), it would now be £1,015,284, according to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Calling for a review, Kim Harrison, immediate past president of APIL, said: ‘The payment is for victims of crime with the most catastrophic injuries, including brain damage and paralysis.

‘It should be recognised that the amount established when the cap was set in 1996 will not go as far in today’s money, three decades on... provision for injured victims of crime has been left to fester... This scheme is falling short, including in terms of eligibility, time limits on bringing claims, and keeping in-step with modern crimes including online grooming.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll