header-logo header-logo

27 June 2014 / Ferdinand Lovett
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Is cash king?

lawinheadlines_lovett

Ferdinand Lovett considers the potential impact of the recent Budget changes on pensions on divorce

Courts dealing with divorce settlements have historically treated the pension rights of either divorcing party differently from other assets, such as savings, shares or property. For the time being, this makes sense: pension rights are, in most cases, illiquid assets in comparison to other forms of property. They are used to obtain a stable future income stream rather than cash for the here and now.

But will this all change from April 2015, if the proposed liberalisation of the rules governing access to defined contribution (DC) pension savings hit the statute books in substantially the same shape as set out in the 2014 Budget? Certainly, the recent Queen’s Speech indicates this is still the plan (“Legislation will be brought forward to give those who have saved discretion over the use of their retirement funds.”)

Broadly, it is proposed that everyone will have the flexibility to take their DC benefits from age 55 “whenever and however they wish”, regardless of their total DC pension savings. This will mean that individuals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll