header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The case for set-off (Pt I)

duncan

In the first article of a two-part series Simon Duncan reviews the legal basis for a bank to apply insolvency set-off

Set-off is the right of a debtor, himself owed money by his creditor, to effectively secure payment of the debt to him by setting it off against his own liability. In swaps mis-selling claims against banks, banks frequently set-off the company’s debt to the bank against damages or redress payments that the bank owes to the company where the company has gone into liquidation.

In the first part of this two-part article I review the legal basis for a bank to apply insolvency set-off in the following scenario. A bank (“B”) is owed £500,000 on an overdraft advanced to company (“A”). A has since gone into insolvent liquidation.

A (acting by its liquidator) sues B for the mis-selling of an interest rate swap and is awarded £500,000 or is offered the same sum as redress out of court. B then applies statutory insolvency set off pursuant to Insolvency Rule 4.90. The effect is to extinguish the payment to A.

Rule

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll