header-logo header-logo

18 January 2019 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The case for a referendum re-run

How close is Plan B for a People's Vote? David Wolchover reports

In the face of the anticipated defeat of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, a second referendum was increasingly being touted as the government’s lifeboat. Indeed, it might have been supposed that they were already preparing to clamber aboard, if any credence attached to reports that Downing Street and Conservative Central Office were working on contingency plans for a poll (see eg, Tim Shipman, ‘Theresa May’s team plots new EU referendum,’ The Times, 16 December 2018).

But a new study led by Professor Tim Bale of Queen Mary College and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) suggests that the government may now be under considerable Conservative constituency party pressure to continue to reject a referendum and to opt instead for a no-deal exit if or when the withdrawal agreement is rejected following the Commons ‘meaningful vote’ debate due to start on or about 9 January (see Rajeev Syal, ‘Brexit: most Tory members would choose no deal over May’s plan,’ The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll