header-logo header-logo

08 September 2017 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The case of the missing mandate

nlj_7752_davies_1

David Wolchover contends that there is no mandate for the UK to be taken out of the EU & considers how the European Parliament may force a further referendum

Early in June Counsel Magazine online published an article in which I contended that the Prime Minister’s 29 March 2017 letter to President of the Council of Europe Donald Tusk did not, despite its claim, actually trigger Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union (“Article 50: the trigger that never was?”). My argument was and remains that no decision or equivalent declaration of intention has ever been made by the UK to leave the EU and the government enjoys no mandate to embark upon the journey to withdrawal.

Having further contemplated the issue I have formulated a further argument which arguably makes the case against the existence of a mandate for invoking Art 50 incontrovertible. The purpose of this article is to highlight that new argument, which is likely to provide the basis for discreet steps to be taken to bring the issue before the European Union Court of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll