header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Media , Environment
printer mail-detail

Carry on screening

The government should have done its homework before bombarding schools with An Inconvenient Truth, says Nicholas Hancox

When the government decided to distribute Al Gore’s partisan film on climate change, An Inconvenient Truth, wholesale and free of charge to every secondary school in England, its civil servant advisers must surely have mentioned their own inconvenient truth; that biased political propaganda is illegal in maintained schools. 

Why would politicians decide to distribute a DVD to thousands of schools, if they did not want to influence the opinions of the pupils who would watch it? Their objective must have been political; they must have wanted the film to change the opinions of the pupils—not about the science of climate change, but about the desired political response to the science of climate change.
Sections 406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996) were first enacted during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership in 1986. Section 406 bans political indoctrination in maintained schools. Section 407 requires a balanced treatment of all political issues in those same maintained schools. Stuart Dimmock decided to use EA 1996 to support his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll