header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Media , Environment
printer mail-detail

Carry on screening

The government should have done its homework before bombarding schools with An Inconvenient Truth, says Nicholas Hancox

When the government decided to distribute Al Gore’s partisan film on climate change, An Inconvenient Truth, wholesale and free of charge to every secondary school in England, its civil servant advisers must surely have mentioned their own inconvenient truth; that biased political propaganda is illegal in maintained schools. 

Why would politicians decide to distribute a DVD to thousands of schools, if they did not want to influence the opinions of the pupils who would watch it? Their objective must have been political; they must have wanted the film to change the opinions of the pupils—not about the science of climate change, but about the desired political response to the science of climate change.
Sections 406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996) were first enacted during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership in 1986. Section 406 bans political indoctrination in maintained schools. Section 407 requires a balanced treatment of all political issues in those same maintained schools. Stuart Dimmock decided to use EA 1996 to support his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll