header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007 / Adam Samuel
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Carrots and sticks

Will the new complaint rules make solicitors more accountable? asks Adam Samuel

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and its Solicitors’ Code of Conduct will impose a huge change in the way firms handle complaints after July 2007. The appearance of more detailed rules and guidelines to replace the current loose provisions should benefit those practices that use the opportunity to review their relationships with their clients. For the rest, the new rules could easily become a stick with which the SRA might choose to beat them.

Outgoing rules

Solicitors’ Practice Rule 15 requires a firm to operate a complaints handling procedure in accordance with the Client Care Code. Paragraph 7(b) of that insists that every principal in private practice or recognised body ensures that the practice or body has a complaints procedure, follows it, that clients are told who to contact with concerns about service and that a copy of the procedure is given to them on request. The rules say nothing of the procedure’s required content. This is not a demanding rule.

The new code of conduct

Rule 2.05 is central to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll