header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010 / Ed Mitchell
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Care needs in hard times

Ed Mitchell reports on council & court failures to deliver community care

Increasingly, local authorities are having to take hard decisions about the provision of community care services. The Court of Appeal’s decision in R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2010] EWCA Civ 1109, in which it determined a judicial review claim at first instance, is the latest to confirm that it is for an authority to decide how it deploys its community care resources. In other words, the hard decisions are essentially for local authorities to take and not the courts. Accordingly, an authority was entitled to decide to meet an eligible community care need for assistance safely to urinate at night by supplying continence pads rather than the more expensive option of funding a night carer (R v Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Daykin [1998] 1 CCLR 512).

Other aspects of the Court of Appeal’s decision are also of note. The court held that if a local authority has decided precisely to define an eligible need it is not for the courts to redefine it. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll