header-logo header-logo

Car dealerships kept quiet about commissions

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Consumer , Commercial , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

Buyers of cars have a right to know about, and must give consent to, any commission arrangements between their finance lender and car dealer, the Court of Appeal has held

Ruling in three conjoined cases, Johnson v Firstrand Bank (London branch) t/a Motonovo Finance [2024] EWCA Civ 1282, the court found car dealers have a fiduciary duty when arranging finance, and must be upfront about any commission. It held dealers did not satisfy this duty by hiding information about commissions in small print in terms and conditions appended to the finance agreement. Consequently, the lender was liable for the repayment of the commission in all three cases.

Handing down their judgment last week, Lady Justice Andrews and Lords Justice Birss and Edis said: ‘The dealer is acting as a seller of the cars, and also as a credit broker.

‘A credit broker offers services to help people to find credit by considering the market (or a particular section of the market) and introducing them to a potential lender who can offer them a deal which is suitable for their requirements. There is no hint in the evidence in any of these cases that the consumers concerned were aware of this.’

Kavon Hussain, principal of Consumer Rights Solicitors, which acted for two of the appellants, said: ‘This Court of Appeal judgment is going to affect every lender in the market, including Lloyds Black Horse, VW Finance, BMW, Stellantis, Mercedes, and Barclays Clydesdale.

‘We already have a substantial number of clients with claims waiting to go. This decision is a huge step towards those clients being repaid these hidden commissions.’ The firm believes the figure owed to consumers could be as high as £42bn. 

In 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority banned lenders from allowing car dealers to set the rates charged to customers on credit agreements. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll