header-logo header-logo

05 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Capital gains tax

Blackwell v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] EWCA Civ 232, [2017] All ER (D) 94 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal in dismissing the appellant taxpayer’s appeal, held that he could not, in computing the gain accruing to him on the disposal of shares, bring into account, by way of deduction, expenditure incurred by him in buying his release from a personal contractual obligation to a third party restrictive of his ability to vote or sell those shares. Accordingly, s 38(1)(b) of the Taxation of Capital Gains Act 1992 had not applied to the present facts.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll