header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Capacity assessment

mason

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Re Walker (Deceased) (unreported, 20 November 2014), Mrs Walker had separated from her husband of 26 years and lived for two years with her partner, Mr Badmin, who was 23 years her junior, and two years older than her oldest daughter. She made a will in January 2010, one month before she died of a brain tumour. Ancillary relief proceedings in relation to her divorce from Mr Walker were not concluded before her death. She left a life interest in her share of matrimonial assets to Mr Badmin and her residuary estate as to 50% to Mr Badmin and as to 25% to each of her daughters. She also signed a letter setting out her reasons for making the will in these terms (the letter).

Mrs Walker’s daughters challenged the will on the bases of lack of testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval. The daughters argued that the test for capacity should be that set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). They submitted that Mrs Walker did not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll