header-logo header-logo

04 January 2018
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Candy brothers win High Court battle

Billionaire property developers the Candy brothers have won a three-year High Court case against a former friend.

Businessman Mark Holyoake accused the brothers of extortion, blackmail, intimidation and breach of data protection legislation among lurid allegations about their business dealings. However, Mr Justice Nugee cleared them of all charges.

Holyoake had sought £132m in damages, accusing the brothers of attempting to force him to pay £37m interest on a £12m loan used to develop a London mansion block.

Delivering his lengthy judgment in Holyoake v Candy [2017] EWHC 3397 (Ch), Nugee J said Holyoake ‘was not a naïve consumer’ but ‘a sophisticated borrower’ trying to make a profit from a business venture’, and even though the extension fees on the loan were ‘steep, the relationship between the parties was not unfair’.

Issue: 7775 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll