header-logo header-logo

23 September 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

R v Broughton: can this be right?

28037
R v Broughton: a strong prosecution case on the face of the evidence, but a quashed conviction. Alec Samuels reviews the case

In brief

  • In Broughton the jury convicted but the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.

At the Bestival musical festival in 2017, the defendant (D) gave and supplied his girlfriend (V) some illegal drugs. Furthermore he ‘bumped them up’, that is to say he added something stronger than was normally to be expected. D took V to an adjoining wood. V took the drugs. V became visibly seriously ill and distressed, showing the classic signs of illegal drug abuse. D did not call the police or the gig officials. D was subject to a suspended sentence, so apprehensive about doing so.

After some delay D did call V’s parents, who lived some hours distance away (and set off by car). Eventually D did call the gig officials; but unfortunately there was a misunderstanding over location, and it took quite a long time finally to locate V and D. V then finally received medical attention, but unfortunately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll