header-logo header-logo

23 September 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

R v Broughton: can this be right?

28037
R v Broughton: a strong prosecution case on the face of the evidence, but a quashed conviction. Alec Samuels reviews the case

In brief

  • In Broughton the jury convicted but the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.

At the Bestival musical festival in 2017, the defendant (D) gave and supplied his girlfriend (V) some illegal drugs. Furthermore he ‘bumped them up’, that is to say he added something stronger than was normally to be expected. D took V to an adjoining wood. V took the drugs. V became visibly seriously ill and distressed, showing the classic signs of illegal drug abuse. D did not call the police or the gig officials. D was subject to a suspended sentence, so apprehensive about doing so.

After some delay D did call V’s parents, who lived some hours distance away (and set off by car). Eventually D did call the gig officials; but unfortunately there was a misunderstanding over location, and it took quite a long time finally to locate V and D. V then finally received medical attention, but unfortunately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll