header-logo header-logo

23 September 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

R v Broughton: can this be right?

28037
R v Broughton: a strong prosecution case on the face of the evidence, but a quashed conviction. Alec Samuels reviews the case

In brief

  • In Broughton the jury convicted but the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction.

At the Bestival musical festival in 2017, the defendant (D) gave and supplied his girlfriend (V) some illegal drugs. Furthermore he ‘bumped them up’, that is to say he added something stronger than was normally to be expected. D took V to an adjoining wood. V took the drugs. V became visibly seriously ill and distressed, showing the classic signs of illegal drug abuse. D did not call the police or the gig officials. D was subject to a suspended sentence, so apprehensive about doing so.

After some delay D did call V’s parents, who lived some hours distance away (and set off by car). Eventually D did call the gig officials; but unfortunately there was a misunderstanding over location, and it took quite a long time finally to locate V and D. V then finally received medical attention, but unfortunately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll