header-logo header-logo

13 May 2011 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Can they sell the libraries?

103015457-1_4

Will a Victorian statute prevent local councils selling off our museums & libraries to make ends meet? Paul Letman investigates

The Victorians were in many respects a public-minded lot, thus to facilitate and encourage grants of land for school sites, and for institutions promoting literature, science and the fine arts, and places of worship, they passed a number of statutes such as the School Sites Acts (SSA) of 1836 to 1844, the Literary and Scientific Institutions Act 1854 (LSIA 1854) and the Places of Worship Sites Act 1873.

SSA 1841 has already been the subject of much judicial attention, as schools established under that Act have been closed over the years. But it is LSIA 1854 that is now under the spotlight, as a result of present day austerity measures and the plans of many local authorities to sell off long established museums and libraries to make ends meet (see the Financial Times 29 March 2011 “Councils in a bind as library sell-off falls foul of Victorian law”).

Reverter provision

The key concern highlighted is the operation of the so-called

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll