header-logo header-logo

Can HIPs save the planet?

22 November 2007 / David Marsden
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Are we expecting too much from HIPs? David Marsden reports

Home information packs (HIPs) have caused much debate over the last year. They were first introduced for four-bedroom and larger houses in August 2007. This was extended to cover three-bedroom houses on 10 September 2007. At the time the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) was making confident statements that HIPs would be introduced to the whole residential market by the end of 2007.

The DCLG has a well-oiled PR machine and those interested in HIPs have been bombarded with e-mails from it for many months. A statement was issued in mid October confirming that HIPs would not be extended to all residential properties for the time being. It is interesting to note that this information was not circulated in the normal way via e-mail to those interested in HIPs. Perhaps this is a sign of the government deciding that it wants this scheme buried after all? Therefore, the uncertainty continues.
What has happened in practice? How has the market, and those involved in it, adapted to the new regime?

CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR

Generally,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll