header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024 / Jeremy Clarke-Williams
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Can a trade union sue for defamation?

This long-disputed question finally has an answer, writes Jeremy Clarke-Williams
  • Examines the legislation and case law that have affected the right of trade unions to sue for defamation, in particular relating to whether they are considered ‘quasi corporations’.
  • Sets out the facts of Prospect v Evans, which gave welcome clarity on the matter, ruling that trade unions can indeed bring a claim.

Whether a trade union has the capacity to sue for the tort of defamation has been a matter of some uncertainty for many years. Until 1971, unions were treated as ‘quasi corporations’, and this was regarded by the courts as bestowing sufficient legal personality to sue for defamation.

However, in Electrical Electronic Telecommunication and Plumbing Union v Times Newspapers Ltd [1980] QB 585, [1980] 1 All ER 1097 (EETPU), the union’s libel action was dismissed when it was held that the provision in s 2(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974 (TULRA 1974) which stipulated that: ‘A trade union… shall not be, or be treated as if it were a body corporate’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll