header-logo header-logo

09 May 2013 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The calm before the storm

istock_000006666207medium

The worst is yet to come for the legal profession, warns Patrick Allen

On 1 April 2013 the existing rules for conditional fee agreements (CFAs) and personal injury (PI) work were scrapped. Success fees and after the event (ATE) premiums are no longer recoverable from the losing party. In a raft of changes, a new rule on proportionality, fixed costs, budgeting, and damage based agreements have been introduced.

In the weeks before 1 April, there was a frenzy of activity in solicitors’ firms, chambers and ATE offices, first to ensure that existing cases could take advantage of the old rules before the cut off and second to devise new terms in readiness for 2 April.

One ATE insurer sold £30m of policies in March 2013 alone, compared to normal annual turnover of £1m.

The Law Society at the last minute produced a new model CFA for PI cases. Thankfully, the regulations regarding new CFAs are not unduly prescriptive. The main point is that it must include a reference to the new capped success fee which is now recoverable from the client and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll