header-logo header-logo

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-detail

Calls to repeal pre-Victorian vagrancy laws

A coalition of lawyers, police and homelessness charities has called on the government to scrap the Vagrancy Act 1824, which criminalises rough sleeping and begging.

A report by Crisis, the homelessness charity, published last week, argues that the Act is out of date, inhumane and needlessly pushes vulnerable people further from help. It warns that the Act makes it the responsibility of the police to deal with rough sleeping when a multi-agency approach and use of outreach services is a more helpful approach.

The government has said it will review the Act as part of its rough sleeping strategy. The Vagrancy Act was abolished in Scotland in 1982.

Bindmans partner Mike Schwarz, who contributed to the Crisis report, said: ‘I am really impressed by Crisis’ and others’ initiative to have the antiquated and socially regressive Vagrancy Act reviewed and repealed.

‘It is, literally a pre-Victorian piece of legislation, reflecting the outdated and oppressive views from a bygone era on a section of our community which needs support, rather than criminalisation. The report will, I hope, be the final step towards its abolition.’

The 1824 Act was originally introduced to make it easier for police to deal with destitute soldiers returning from the Napoleonic Wars. It makes it a criminal offence to ‘wander abroad’ or to be ‘in any public place, street, highway, court, or passage, to beg or gather alms’ in England and Wales.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by Crisis to the Ministry of Justice, there were 1,320 recorded prosecutions under the Act in 2018, an increase of 6% on the previous year, but less than half the number made five years ago. 

Between 2014 and 2018, rough sleeping in England rose by 70%.

Homeless people have reported being fined £100 and banned from town centres under the Act, risking prison if they are caught again. However, this can prevent those people using local services for rough sleepers. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Charities , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll