header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-detail

Calls for legislation on intimate image abuse

Possession of non-consensual intimate images (NCII) would become a criminal offence similar to that for child sexual abuse material, under proposals launched by a parliamentary committee.

The Women and Equalities Committee called on the government this week to amend the Crime and Policing Bill currently going through Parliament in order to create the offence. It warned this is necessary to force online platforms to delete the images—according to the Revenge Porn Helpline, about 10% of NCII are not removed and continue to be accessible in the UK, often hosted on sites based overseas including some dedicated to NCII abuse.

Currently, the Online Safety Act 2023 creates criminal offences related to the making and sharing of NCII. It gives Ofcom powers to impose fines and order services to take material down.

However, Ofcom’s powers are slow, says Sarah Owen MP, the committee’s chair, and ‘a legal gap remains. NCII can circulate online years after the image was first posted’.

As well as criminalising possession, the committee’s report, ‘Tackling non-consensual intimate image abuse’, published this week, calls for the establishment of an Online Safety Commission. This would be a statutory body akin to the eSafety Commission in Australia, with a focus on support for individuals. The commission would act on behalf of individuals who report NCII content, applying for and sending court orders demanding websites take down content or requiring perpetrators to pay compensation for harm caused.

Owen said: ‘The committee heard shocking evidence of [NCII’s] scale and impact, with a tenfold increase in just four years and more than 22,000 reported cases in 2024.

‘There is also an urgent need for courts to confiscate devices storing NCII content. There have been cases where, following the criminal justice process, perpetrators have had devices containing the NCII returned to them. This is harrowing for victims.’ 

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Privacy , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll