header-logo header-logo

29 May 2026 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8163 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Calling time on hereditary peers? (Pt 6)

251066
© robertharding / Alamy Stock Photo

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 received royal assent earlier in the spring, bringing to an end centuries of tradition, writes Neil Parpworth

  • The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 ends the automatic right of hereditary peers to sit in the House of Lords, marking a major constitutional change by severing the link between hereditary status and legislative membership.
  • While the Act focuses narrowly on hereditary peers, parliamentary debates highlighted wider unresolved reform issues, including retirement ages, attendance requirements, and the role of bishops, with the government signalling that further House of Lords reform is likely to proceed incrementally.

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 received royal assent on 18 March 2026. While some of its provisions came into force on that day, the remainder of the Act, including s 1, came into force at the end of the previous session of Parliament: see s 5(3) and (4).

While it is a short enactment consisting of a mere six sections, it is a constitutionally significant piece of legislation. This is because it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll