header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Calling time on hereditary peers? (Pt 5)

218608
A waste of time or due process? Neil Parpworth reports on the Lords debating the Lords
  • The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill has completed its committee stage, involving extensive debates on more than 100 amendments.
  • Proposals included a mandatory retirement age and attendance requirements for peers, but the government maintained that the Bill wasn’t the right vehicle for those changes.
  • After 22.5 hours of parliamentary time, the Bill reported without amendments.

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill has now completed its committee stage in the House of Lords. Behind this bald statement lies the fact that it was not an entirely smooth process, despite the Bill seeking to give effect to a manifesto commitment made by the government, and regardless of it having achieved substantial majorities at each stage of its progress in the House of Commons.

Of course, as several peers pointed out, even where a government has a mandate to introduce legislation, the second chamber still has a role to play in scrutinising and revising the Bills which come before it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll