Legal Services Institute question reserved legal activities
A legal think tank has called for a radical overhaul of the right of audience, notarial activities and other reserved legal activities which can only be carried out by certain authorised persons.
The Legal Services Institute (LSI), an offshoot of the College of Law, looked into the historical reasons behind the reserved legal activity structure and concluded it had “tenuous foundations”. The six reserved legal activities also include the conduct of litigation; reserved instrument activities; probate activities; and the administration of oaths.
According to the LSI paper, Reserved Legal Activities: History and Rationale, the reasoning behind reserving such activities is “obscure” and there is “evidence that at least some of them were intended for the protection of the legal profession”.
The LSI is calling on the Legal Services Board to draw up a general set of criteria for defining activities as reserved, and argues that reservation must be shown to be in the public interest. It claims consumers are “bewildered” as to why these activities are reserved.
Professor Stephen Mayson, director of the LSI, says that the origins of
