header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010 / Paul Smethurst
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession
printer mail-detail

Buyer beware

Paul Smethurst examines the impact & implications of the new Bribery Act

Picture the scene—pine and glass boardroom, champagne and smiles all around. With economic recovery being driven by consolidation you have just successfully assisted your corporate client in the acquisition of a company that will open up new overseas markets, the possibility of government work and access to a team of people who, if lifestyle is anything to go on, are clearly very successful.

Six months on and the mood has changed. Your client has discovered a culture where the “bung” is king in terms of both winning new work and appointing suppliers and wants to know what you did during the deal transaction process to ensure compliance with the Bribery Act 2010 as some very friendly people from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) are coming in for a chat and by the way who is your PI insurer?

The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent in April and its provisions are expected to come into force in April 2011. As well as individual offences in respect of bribing, being bribed and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll