header-logo header-logo

19 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Business Network promotes rule of law

The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law’s new Business Network launched this week, with the support of several FTSE 100 leaders, including BP, BT, Diageo, HSBC, Shell, Unilever, and Vodafone.

The Bingham Centre wants to promote a clear understanding of the importance of the rule of law in facilitating trade and laying the foundations for economic growth. The Centre focuses particularly on developing states

The Business Network, chaired by Graham Vinter, formerly of BG Group, will support the think tank’s global initiatives while identifying and addressing specific challenges in the countries where they operate.

Vinter said multinational companies faced “a complex set of legal risks, including contractual enforceability, regulatory predictability and bribery and corruption in all its forms, none of which can be addressed without the rule of law”.

The majority of executives have in the past five years experienced several rule of law failures in countries in which they are investing, according to a survey of 300 senior decision-makers at Forbes 2000 companies conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit for The Bingham Centre. Examples include expropriation by governments of key assets, retrospective taxation, poor protection of intellectual property rights and unenforceability of promises. The survey found that these had resulted in financial loss for multinational companies and damage to local economies.

Welcoming the initiative, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, said: “The rule of law provides the foundation for peace, political stability, human dignity and economic sustainability.

“The business community needs the firm and consistent application of the rule of law, thus contributing to economic development. Business can also play a key part in helping to build and sustain the rule of law in those countries where it has a presence, helping to make the world a safer and more equitable place.”

Some projects under consideration by the Business Network include the implications of Brexit on trade and investment, the proportionality of regulatory penalties and forms of redress, tensions between national and international human rights standards, and rule of law training and resources for boards and senior managers.

Issue: 7731 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll