header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business in decline at Commercial Courts

London’s Commercial Courts experienced a dramatic drop in activity in the 12 months up to March 2022, compared to the previous year

One third fewer litigants appeared in the courts compared to 2020-21, and there was a 20% decrease in the number of judgments handed down (to 234), according to Portland’s Commercial Courts Report 2022, published last week. However, the proportion of international litigants returned to pre-pandemic levels, with non-UK litigants accounting for 54% of the total number and 75 different nationalities represented.

Moreover, the proportion of Russian litigants was the highest it has ever been, with 41 Russian litigants listed, double the number appearing in 2017. Russian accounted for the second largest group of litigants in the courts, behind the UK.

The report notes that Brexit, judgments no longer being readily enforceable in the EU, and financial institutions and businesses shifting from London to EU27 centres, and competition from new commercial courts in Singapore, Qatar and elsewhere may be a ‘plausible explanatory narrative’ for the decline. It also highlights that the report is based only on results up to March 2022 and the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, sanctions and the withdrawal by London law firms from Russia is ‘likely to be profound’. Consequently, next year’s results may look very different and it may be the ‘end of an era’ for the dominance of Russian litigants. A poll commissioned by Portland found a majority of the public opposed to English courts and law firms accepting Russian litigants while the invasion of Ukraine is ongoing.

Philip Hall, senior partner at Portland, said: ‘It’s too early to tell if we are on the precipice of a decline brought on by the delayed consequences of Covid-19 and other factors―or whether this is a once-off.

‘However, based on the breadth of international litigants choosing London, the city's position as a centre for dispute resolution remains as strong as ever.’

Read the full report here (subscription required).

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll