header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business in decline at Commercial Courts

London’s Commercial Courts experienced a dramatic drop in activity in the 12 months up to March 2022, compared to the previous year

One third fewer litigants appeared in the courts compared to 2020-21, and there was a 20% decrease in the number of judgments handed down (to 234), according to Portland’s Commercial Courts Report 2022, published last week. However, the proportion of international litigants returned to pre-pandemic levels, with non-UK litigants accounting for 54% of the total number and 75 different nationalities represented.

Moreover, the proportion of Russian litigants was the highest it has ever been, with 41 Russian litigants listed, double the number appearing in 2017. Russian accounted for the second largest group of litigants in the courts, behind the UK.

The report notes that Brexit, judgments no longer being readily enforceable in the EU, and financial institutions and businesses shifting from London to EU27 centres, and competition from new commercial courts in Singapore, Qatar and elsewhere may be a ‘plausible explanatory narrative’ for the decline. It also highlights that the report is based only on results up to March 2022 and the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, sanctions and the withdrawal by London law firms from Russia is ‘likely to be profound’. Consequently, next year’s results may look very different and it may be the ‘end of an era’ for the dominance of Russian litigants. A poll commissioned by Portland found a majority of the public opposed to English courts and law firms accepting Russian litigants while the invasion of Ukraine is ongoing.

Philip Hall, senior partner at Portland, said: ‘It’s too early to tell if we are on the precipice of a decline brought on by the delayed consequences of Covid-19 and other factors―or whether this is a once-off.

‘However, based on the breadth of international litigants choosing London, the city's position as a centre for dispute resolution remains as strong as ever.’

Read the full report here (subscription required).

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll