header-logo header-logo

07 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-detail

Business & human rights

A global team of more than 60 Debevoise & Plimpton lawyers has authored a landmark report, the ‘UN guiding principles on business and human rights at 10’ (UNGPs)

The UNGPs consist of 31 principles setting out the duties and responsibilities of governments and business enterprises to prevent and address adverse impacts on people resulting from business activities.

The 264-page report, commissioned by the UN, marks ten years since the adoption of the UNGPs in 2011. It examines how judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in more than 50 jurisdictions have used and referred to the UNGPs in reaching their decisions.

It identifies regional and international trends and predicts how the use of the UNGPs might evolve in future. While there were few direct references to the UNGPs in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions, the researchers thought this was likely to change. Some recent legislation, such as the EU Taxonomy Regulation of March 2021, makes explicit reference to the UNGPs, while other legislation, such as the Modern Slavery Act 2015, refers to them as part of their rationale.

The researchers also report an increasing number of complaints in which the UNGPs have been cited by the parties, including in the English, US and Canadian courts.

Other observations include that the UNGPs are increasingly being incorporated into investment treaties and may come to play a more important role in international arbitration. One noticeable trend is towards dedicated business and human rights arbitration instruments and procedures, for example, the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a first of its kind agreement between retailers and trade unions following the 2013 Rana Plaza building collapse. This Accord covers more than 1,600 factories and two million workers in Bangladesh and is, the report notes, ‘the first example of an arbitration procedure being integrated into an international framework to resolve business and human rights disputes’.

Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Commercial , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll