header-logo header-logo

01 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bus ad ban was lawful

Adverts proclaiming “Not gay! Ex-gay, post-gay and proud! Get over it!” were lawfully banned from the sides of London buses, the High Court has ruled.

The adverts were sponsored by Christian charity Core Issues Trust in April 2012, in response to gay rights charity Stonewall’s campaign “Some people are gay. Get over it!”.  

The High Court had earlier ruled that the ban was lawful but the Court of Appeal asked Mrs Justice Lang to reconsider the case.

Core Issues claimed London Mayor Boris Johnson had overstepped his authority by instructing Transport for London (TfL) to ban the adverts in a bid to win over gay rights-supporting voters shortly before the Mayoral election. It said Johnson’s communications advisor had hinted to The Guardian newspaper that he told TfL to ban the adverts, and that Johnson’s role was shown by e-mails revealed by a Freedom of Information request.

However, Lang J ruled this week that TfL took the decision even though the Mayor’s office made its views known. 

Core Issues, which seeks to help people who want to change their sexual preference, described the judgment as “contrived and punitive”, and denied that its campaign was an advert for “gay cure” therapy.

Howard Carter, general counsel at TfL, says: “It was our decision not to run the adverts and there was no improper purpose behind our decision. Our decision was justified.”

 

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll