header-logo header-logo

09 August 2007 / Shantanu Majumdar KC
Issue: 7285 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The burden of history

Shantanu Majumdar considers the uneasy relationship between common law and equity

The Supreme Court of Judicature Acts 1873–91 produced a fusion of the administration of the courts, but whether and to what extent they have produced a fusion of the substantive law—of common law with equity—remains a difficult and surprisingly controversial question.

One of the oddities of the statutory limitation regime is that it does not expressly or directly apply to equitable claims but that is not to say that it is silent on the matter. The Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), s 36 is concerned with equitable jurisdiction and remedies and takes with one hand but gives back with the other in stipulating that the time limit under numerous sections of LA 1980 “shall not apply to any claim for specific performance of a contract or for an injunction or for other equitable relief” except, tantalisingly:

“In so far as any such time limit may be applied by the court by analogy in like manner as the corresponding time limit under any enactment repealed by the Limitation Act 1939 was applied before

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll