header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bullying, harassment & discrimination at the Bar

Inappropriate or unacceptable behaviour, bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar is a ‘systemic issue’, the Bar Council has said, after research uncovered shocking levels of abuse at work

The poor behaviour ranged across the profession and involved judges, barristers, chambers’ staff, solicitors and court staff. Incidents ranged from pejorative or demeaning language to intimidating or bullying behaviour, unwanted attention, unwanted physical contact, sexual harassment and serious abuse, inappropriate comments, online abuse, and sexist, racist and ableist behaviours.

Bar Council research published last week, ‘Bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar 2023’, found 44% of respondents have experienced or observed such behaviour while working either in person or online (up from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017).

Of the 1,233 barristers who reported experiencing or observing bullying and/or harassment, the majority (53%) reported a member of the judiciary as the person responsible, followed by a more senior barrister (31%) or a barrister at the same level (14%).

Women, people of colour, younger and more junior members of the Bar were most affected by bullying, harassment and discrimination. Barristers with caring responsibilities or a disability also reported being disproportionately affected.

The perpetrators of bad behaviour were generally in a position of power or influence, and included judges, more senior barristers, senior clerks and practice managers. Fear of repercussions was the primary reason given for not reporting incidents. In particular, some people were told that if they complained they would never work at the Bar again.

The data was drawn from the biennial survey, Barristers’ working lives, as well as from reports to Talk to Spot and calls to the Bar’s helplines.

Nick Vineall KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the Bar Council was committed to addressing the problems and has commissioned a review, to be established by spring 2024 and report back by spring 2025, to identify strategies to curb the abuse.

Sam Townend KC, Chair-Elect of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bar Council identifies bullying, harassment and discrimination as a systemic issue and we hope the judiciary, clerks, chambers professionals and the Inns will work together with us to facilitate meaningful change.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll