header-logo header-logo

Bullying & harassment at the Bar

10 September 2025
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found

Harman’s explosive ‘Independent review of bullying, harassment and sexual harassment at the Bar’, published this week, draws on the experience of hundreds of professionals, including those who have been groped, propositioned, shouted at in court and left feeling ‘completely isolated’. Most victims did not report their experience because they feared being labelled a ‘troublemaker’.

‘Bullying, harassment and sexual harassment is a problem at the Bar and on the Bench, within chambers and courtrooms, in open court and behind robing room doors,’ Harman said.

Her review makes 36 recommendations for reform, including proscribing as misconduct any sexual relations between barristers and pupils, mini-pupils or people on work experience. It recommends mandatory anti-bullying and anti-harassment standards, policies and training across the profession, time limits for processing complaints, and the creation of a commissioner for conduct.

Harman’s review proposes abolishing the three-month limit for a barrister to make a complaint against a judge. It also suggests that sanctions decisions against judges are taken by the Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor—to counter the perception that disciplinary action is too soft.

Examples given of judicial bullying included one first-tier tribunal judge with a reputation for bullying juniors, especially women, who is believed to have been spoken to by senior judiciary but with no effect. Harman’s review reports: ‘In a recent case, he refused to deal with female counsel and instead directed his questions to male counsel. He spoke to the female counsel in a negative tone, scoffing and rolling his eyes every time the female counsel spoke. This is apparently not uncommon.’

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said the review made for ‘uncomfortable reading’ and it was ‘imperative that all barristers have a safe working environment’.

Baroness Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, said there are ‘too many examples of judicial bullying… We are currently reviewing the routes available to raise concerns and resolve issues and working to challenge and change unacceptable behaviour.’

Issue: 8130 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll