header-logo header-logo

Abolishing salary sacrifice for pensions 'a tax on working people'

26 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Employment , Tax , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions, while solicitors breathed a sigh of relief this week after the much-anticipated tax on limited liability partnerships (LLPs) failed to materialise

There was mounting speculation ahead of the Autumn Budget this week that Chancellor Rachel Reeves would drop the exemption from national insurance for LLPs, effectively levying an extra 15% tax.

This prompted a campaign by the Law Society and other legal groups seeking to persuade Reeves to rule it out.

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘Leaders from across the professional services sector came together this month to write to the Chancellor to warn against such a measure and how damaging it would be for the UK economy.

‘The legal sector is already contending with major regulatory changes in anti-money laundering and compliance. Any additional burdens would have created a perfect storm on firms’ ability to invest, hire, and contribute to growth, which could prove damaging to the wider economy.’

Key elements of the Budget included a £2,000 cap on the national insurance threshold for salary sacrifice pension contributions, an extra 2% on tax for income from property or dividends, and the so-called ‘mansion tax’ on homes worth more than £2m.

The imposition of the £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions has prompted dismay.

James Dean, pensions partner at Freeths, said the decision, in the Autumn Budget this week, ‘will be incredibly unpopular across the pensions industry.

‘Introducing this measure from 2029 risks sending the wrong signal at precisely the wrong time. With many people already struggling to save enough for their retirement, this policy could hugely discourage pension savings and undermine long-term financial security.’

Steve Hitchiner, chair of the Tax Group at the Society of Pensions Professionals (SPP), said: ‘Abolishing salary sacrifice for pensions will affect the take home pay of millions of employees—especially basic rate taxpayers—and is a tax on working people, in spirit if not in name.

‘It is also another sizeable cost to employers and, perhaps most importantly its removal will reduce pension saving.’

Contributions above the cap will incur national insurance payments. Reeves justified lifting the exemption by warning costs will triple to £8bn by 2030.

Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Employment , Tax , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll