header-logo header-logo

14 May 2015
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

BSB seeks to help chambers in distress

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is seeking new statutory powers to step into barristers’ failing chambers, companies and partnerships to protect clients when things go seriously wrong.

In a consultation paper launched this week, the BSB argues for the right to take control of client files in serious instances of regulatory non-compliance, dishonesty, insolvency or in other instances where the client’s interests require protection. This would give the BSB powers to take action such as obtaining alternative representation for clients and securing any papers and assets that belong to them.

Barristers could also be asked to pay into a compensation fund in future—while the BSB does not believe this is necessary at present, the market and its risks may change.

Ewen Macleod, director of regulatory policy for the BSB, says: “To be clear: these are powers that would be used very rarely, but we think that, in the event something goes awry, all clients should benefit from the same safeguards—regardless of whether they’re the client of an ABS, a BSB-regulated entity, or a barristers’ chambers.

“Other regulators already have similar controls so we want to ensure there are no holes in the safety net for consumers. For us, having these powers available, if and when we need them, is key to protecting the public interest and upholding the Regulatory Objectives set out in the Legal Services Act.”

Currently, the BSB’s controls exist by means of contract. The consultation also proposes putting many of the BSB’s existing regulatory powers on a statutory footing.

Issue: 7652 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll