header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016 / David Greene
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Brothers in arms

nlj_7702_greene

Lords Justices Briggs & Jackson progress their quests to rescue civil justice, reports David Greene

The Westminster Legal Forum always runs a good show on public policy issues and development. Its recent forum on civil justice was no exception, bringing together high level speakers and stakeholders, led on this occasion by the two big hitters on recent proposals for change, Lords Justices Briggs and Jackson. Indeed both chose the occasion to develop their recent proposals on, respectively, the online court and fixed costs. The theme of both was that civil justice needs rescuing, at least at the lower end, and their proposals are a route that will open up the process to those who can ill afford the costs and risks of litigation and for whom access to justice is severely limited. They are not wrong on that count although we may differ in some respects only as to the way to resolve this seemingly worsening position.

Briggs on line

Lord Justice Briggs is due to submit his final report in the next couple of months. It covers a number of subjects but it is the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll