header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Broken promises to marry: left at the alter

117253
For better or worse? Mark Pawlowski looks back on the options available to those on the end of a broken promise to marry

In her 2014 book Breach of promise to marry: a history of how jilted brides settled scores, Denise Bates writes:

‘While Dickens’s embittered spinster Miss Havisham stopped all her clocks on her wedding day and “never since looked upon the light of day”, the reality was much brighter for thousands of jilted women. The real Miss Havishams didn’t mope in faded wedding finery—they hired lawyers and struck the first “no win, no fee” deals to sue for breach of promise.’

Until 1970, breach of promise to marry was a common law tort under English law. There could be no action, however, unless a contract to marry had been made. No particular form of words was necessary, and the contract did not have to be evidenced in writing. Interestingly, however, the claim could not succeed unless the claimant’s testimony was corroborated by some other independent evidence in support of the promise. Although most cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll