header-logo header-logo

24 January 2014 / Stephanie Cope
Issue: 7591 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Broken Brits abroad

web_cope

Stephanie Cope scrutinises a recent ruling on the liability of tour operators for accidents abroad

Those booking a holiday through a tour operator reasonably expect the travel and accommodation provided to meet the standards offered by the operator. But what of the holiday maker who suffers a personal injury while on holiday? The law in this area has recently been considered by the Court of Appeal in Japp v Virgin Holidays Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1371, [2013] All ER (D) 99 (Nov). The judgment provides important clarification on the liability of tour operators for injuries involving defects in accommodation and seems generally to improve the position of the tour operator in such claims.

The law

The foundations in relation to a tour operator’s duty of care were laid in Wilson v Best Travel Limited [1993] 1 ALL ER 353 in the High Court. The claim was pursued under s 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Not surprisingly, Phillips J held that the duty of care includes a duty to exercise reasonable care to ensure the safety of hotel guests.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll