header-logo header-logo

15 January 2016 / Mark Burns
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bridging the gap

nlj_7682_burns

By offering increased transparency in costs & services, comparison sites can benefit firms & potential clients, as Mark Burns explains

There can’t have been many of us that were surprised by the findings of a recent survey by Citizens Advice which claimed that almost 70% of respondents said they couldn’t afford legal services (see Responsive justice: How citizens experience the justice system, November 2015). The survey responses also highlighted the need for more transparency in a profession which has long been surrounded in mystery. The real question relating to the cost of legal advice has to be around whether clients can see value in the service that they receive and if that service meets their needs. What service does a client actually need, what do they want it to include and how much does that service cost?

Price is a complex area—particularly when it comes to procuring legal services where buying decisions should not be made by creating a race to the bottom—but instead, the profession has to take steps to bring client and lawyer closer together and create a greater level of understanding of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll