header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: the endgame (Pt 2)

No deal—no problem? Michael Zander QC reviews the Institute for Government’s latest Brexit Report

  • The EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement.
  • The time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament will make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The Institute for Government has published a timely and sobering assessment of the difficulties of a No Deal exit from the EU. It suggests two reasons making No Deal likely.

  • First, while Boris Johnson says the Irish ‘backstop’ must go, the EU has said repeatedly that it will not renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement and in particular that it will not consider removing the Irish ‘backstop’.
  • Second, even if the EU were willing to negotiate, the time required for ratification and the passage of the necessary legislation through Parliament would make the 31 October deadline difficult to achieve.

The problems before 31 October

There will be no ‘managed no deal’

The EU had made it clear that without a formal withdrawal agreement there will be no ‘side deals’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll