header-logo header-logo

07 February 2017
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: replacing the CJEU

A post-Brexit UK could look to the “controversial” dispute system between Canada and the EU as a replacement for the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), a law professor has suggested.

The Brexit White Paper proposes to end the jurisdiction of the CJEU in the UK, and envisages a “new comprehensive, bold and ambitious free trade agreement” with the EU which “may take in elements of current Single Market arrangements”, as well as a soft border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. But what form of dispute resolution system will replace the CJEU?

Trevor Tayleur, associate professor at The University of Law, said: “If post-Brexit an EU member state were to restrict imports from the UK unlawfully and the UK wanted to challenge that restriction (or vice versa), then there needs to be a tribunal to adjudicate upon the dispute.

“An effective free trade agreement does require some form of supra-national enforcement mechanism which limits the freedom of action of the parties to it, so where international trade is concerned the UK is likely to remain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll