header-logo header-logo

08 November 2016 / Jonathan Rickford
Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: a proposal

Jonathan Rickford advocates taking the common sense approach towards Art 50 & the role of Parliament

Triggering Art 50 of the EU treaty will most probably lead to UK exit from the EU within a period of two years after notice of the decision to withdraw is given (the period can be extended if all 27 remaining members states agree, but that seems unlikely). Exit will come about either in accordance with an agreement between the UK, the Council of Ministers of the 27 member states and the European Parliament concluded within that period, or by the failure of the negotiations to conclude in time.

Whether the government has authority under the Royal Prerogative to give notice is a legal question decided in the negative by the Divisional Court on 3 November, but to be finally resolved by the Supreme Court before the year end (see Michael Zander QC, "Art 50: the verdict"). If the Supreme Court follows the reasoning of the High Court—that notice changes UK law—then primary legislation is required to give authority to notify. Even if this is not required,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll