header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Brexit & general election top quarterly DB risk survey

Brexit and general election fears are fuelling employer covenant risk concerns, research shows.

In defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, the employee is promised an ‘employer’s covenant’—a certain amount of pension when they retire. Therefore, the employer takes a risk that the investments over the years may not be successful enough to provide that amount.

Independent trustee firm PTL published its latest quarterly DB Risk Survey, which asks respondents to state the main risks facing DB pension schemes at a current point in time, this week.

Concern about a change in government rose from 6.2% to 8.7%. Concern about Brexit dipped marginally from 16.95% to 16.67%, but was substantially higher than previous figures of 13.79% in May 2018 and 10.95% in September 2017.

Richard Butcher, managing director at PTL, said: ‘In June 2017, one year after the European Referendum, concerns about employer covenant risk were at around 14%, but fast forward to the start of this year with an exit from the EU on the horizon but no deal agreed, and that figure has risen to 26%.

‘While direct concerns about Brexit and government are not rising significantly, the things that they impact are. It’s clear that the unclarified terms of Brexit are causing an everincreasing circle of uncertainty over everything in its path.’

Butcher commented that GDPR and cyber security concerns were now lower than expected because of a ‘bold response from the media and industry on cyber security which had helped to ensure that the threats were laid bare.

‘Pension savers, members, trustees, employers and schemes were able to educate and be educated, and take action as a result,’ he said.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll