header-logo header-logo

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit & devolution

EU referendum: consequences of “leave” vote for NI & Wales

Lawyers are keeping a close eye on the polls in the run-up to next week’s EU Referendum, with the latest YouGov survey showing Brexit in the lead with 46% to Remain’s 39%.

While Brexit would have a huge impact on business and government across the UK, the repercussions for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales would be unique. The Scots, of course, could press for a second referendum and ultimately leave the UK, although their ultimate relationship with the EU is impossible to predict.

For Northern Ireland, one of the main changes would be a “hardening” of the border with the Republic of Ireland. Writing in NLJ this week, Fionnuala Connolly, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, says: “In the event of Brexit, it is entirely foreseeable that [the higher courts in Northern Ireland] may be faced with novel legal disputes relating to entry at the land border and indeed residence in the UK.” Connolly also anticipates changes to the functions of the British-Irish Council, particularly in EU law-related areas such as trade or animal disease controls.

Wales received about £245m more from the EU than it paid in, in 2014, according to research by Cardiff University, so the Welsh have a lot to lose in the event of Brexit. The National Assembly is limited in the extent to which it can defend Welsh interests as it has legislative competence only where specifically conferred by Westminster statute. Given that the National Assembly will therefore be dependent on Westminster to make up the funding shortfall post-Brexit, therefore, “an exit strategy that does not properly accommodate Welsh interest may trigger calls for greater devolution,” writes Catherine Grubb, Civitas Law, in this week’s NLJ.

She points out that the impact of Brexit on Wales depends on what is negotiated between Westminster and Cardiff as much as between the UK, EU and the rest of the world.

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll